Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
Sep 30, 2012 8:00am EDT
encounter led to headlines in the british tabloids when barack and michele obama visited buckingham palace with a first time in march 2009. at a reception for heads of state attending did g20 summit the queen and circulated informally through the crowd of high-powered gas. as michele and the queen were talking, they turned toward one of her ladies in waiting to show their difference in height. the queen is about 5-foot three or five ft. four. michele, as you know, nearly 6 feet. the first lady put her arm around the queen and responded by lightly in circling machel's waste. the palace videographer told me that they were totally spontaneous gestures. the tabloid it made a fuss about what they called an unthinkable protocol violation by the american first lady. in fact, the queen was completely relaxed about what heard top advisers called for a display of affection and appreciation. elizabeth's day at the kentucky derby was arranged by one of her closest american friends, will ferris, a former ambassador to britain and a fellow in thoroughbred breeder. during her fifth private holiday on his
Sep 15, 2012 8:00am EDT
shop enough hair. well, michelle obama was a director at the university of chicago medical center and is a much loved about what she accomplished in taking care of the with limited resources, limited incomes and that's extremely important especially since health care is a huge issue at the present time. >> well said. >> hi, charles smith. let me try and frame my question. i mean, you're proposing a number of structural changes, which i would hope would make a difference. assuming for a second date date, the question i have is in a democracy, essentially the median voter makes the difference. so changing any of these laws in terms of voting, primaries, regardless, ultimately is changing the median voter. there's a lot of evidence he cited with your oil at the condition of a lot of social sciences we essentially live in two different universes. so would strike me that to change anything really fundamentally means we had to change attitudes. that is my setup. my question is that one issue that i see as fox news, which is essentially 24/7 propaganda machine. i was curious about your v
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)